WELCOME TO MY PERSONAL BLOGER : "FOY, TABEA, TAOP SONG, MAHIKAI, SWEII, AMULE MENO, NAYAK, WAINAMBEY, ACEM AKWEI, ABRESO..!!

Senin, Mei 29

“Menyimak Keberadaan HTI Di Papua”

picture taken by. https://khilafahnetwork.wordpress.com/
HTI, disebut dalam berbagai pemeberitaan adalah Hizbut Tahir Indonesia, mereka (HTI) sebuah organisasi berbasis keagamaan Islam yang disebut juga berafiliasi dengan FPI (Front Pembela Islam).  Sejumlah sumber media on-line mengungkap HTI didirikan pada tahun 1953 di Al-Qud (Baitul Maqdis) di Palestina. Nanti pada tahun 1980an baru organisasi ini masuk ke Indonesia dan menyebarkan dakwah-dakwah terutama di kampus-kampus lalu kemudian merambah masyarakat akar rumput, dipastikan saat ini HTI sudah berakar kuat di dalam masyarakat Indonesia, mengingat Indonesia termasuk Negara mayoritas muslim terbesar di dunia.

Mayoritas orang Papua nampaknya sangat awam dengan HTI yang disebutkan diatas, pemberitaan HTI terutama social media paling heboh terkait keberadaan organisasi yang dianggap radikal. Orang Papua yang mungkin mayoritas christians akibatnya lambat untuk memahami apabilah ada group radikal Islam tumbuh dan berkembang dan terutama bagaimana misi keagamaan mereka apakah berdampak atau tidak terhadap kehidupan orang Papua dan keberagamaan di Papua dan Papua Barat, ini tantangan baru bagi harmonisasi kehidupan paling toleran yang selama ini terjalin di Tanah Papua.

Papua dan Papua Barat tidak pernah memberi ancaman terhadap agama islam sebab sebagian orang Papua juga beragama Islam terutama di daerah Propinsi Papua Barat seperti halnya Teluk Bintuni, Sorong Selatan, Fakfak dan Kaimana. Tentunya Islam diakui juga bagian dari perjalanan kehidupan orang Papua, namun pertanyaannya akankah HTI juga demikian ? lalu mengapa HTI justru heboh di daerah-daerah Kristen ? Jayapura terutama.

Rekam jejak kejahatan HTI di Papua memang tidak ada, tetapi lantas ini menjadi rujukan garansi bahwa mereka akan berbaur dengan penuh kerukunan yang anti kekerasan di Papua ? atau Papua dipilih HTI sebagai lokasi paling aman untuk membinan dan membangun kekuatan mereka didalam motif-motif terselubung yang menargetkan sesuatu, misalnya pemerintahan nasional, atau misi-misi luar negri di timur tengah, sehingga Papua menjadi lokasi yang paling aman dan nyaman untuk mereka bersembunyi dari radar pasukan keamanan pemerintah Indonesia.

Tanah Papua rupanya masih menjadi wilayah paling aman dan nyaman untuk setiap orang dari berbagai suku, bangsa dan kewarganegaraan masuk dan dengan bebeas bermukim. Ketidakmampuan pemerintah di kedua propinsi ini memberi akses yang hebat bagi segala kecenderungan baik dan buruk terjadi di Papua. ***Black_Fox



Jumat, Mei 5

"Death penalty, religious intolerance focus at Indonesia’s UN rights review"

Main Enterance to UN Building at Geneve, Switzerland
Executions for drug crimes, rising religious intolerance, and the repression of activists and journalists in Papua were some major criticisms lodged against Indonesia’s human rights record at the nation’s Universal Periodic Review in Geneva on Wednesday.

The delegations from around 100 countries lined up to comment on the condition of human rights in Indonesia, with a slew of states from Europe, Africa and the Americas recommending that Indonesia re-impose a moratorium on the death penalty and steps towards the elimination of capital punishment.

The United Nations Human Rights Council conducts the UPR for each member state every five years, providing an opportunity for other nations to analyse progress and highlight concerns.

While states parties applauded Indonesia’s progress in pursuing the protection of rights for some vulnerable groups such as women, children and people with disabilities, Indonesia’s high-level delegation was faced with widespread calls to better protect religious and LGBT minority groups.

Indonesia staunchly defends executions
Long a diplomatic sticking point with nations around the globe, Indonesia came under heavy criticism from dozens of countries for its continued use of capital punishment for people convicted of drug offences.

Indonesian Justice and Human Rights Minister Yassona Laoly pushed back against the criticism, stating that continuing to implement the death penalty was important for addressing the nation’s drug problems.

“Each day 33 persons … die because of drug abuse,” he said. “If you are a family member of the drugs victims, surely you will understand.”

Yassona continued that “the rights of the offender must always be weighed against the rights of the victims,” but that without strict punishments to contain drug use, “the future of the nation will become bleak.”
“As a democratic country, public discourse on the implementation of the death penalty is ongoing in Indonesia,” he said.

Supporters of Jakarta governor candidate Anies Baswedan react as Baswedan leads the count at the Petamburan flat polling station in Jakarta, Indonesia April 19, 2017. Source: Reuters/Beawiharta

Fears of hardline Islam, persecution of minorities
Many delegations cited the recent gubernatorial elections in Jakarta as cause for concern over growing intolerance and religious extremism in Indonesia.

The Christian, ethnically Chinese incumbent Basuki “Ahok” Tjahaja Purnama was defeated last month after a religiously-charged campaign that saw hardline Muslim groups shut down the capital numerous times with mass demonstrations.

The focus of the United States’ statement was protecting minority rights including religious freedom, while Sweden explicitly called for Indonesia to review its controversial 1965 blasphemy law under which Ahok was charged.

But an Indonesian delegation member from the religious affairs ministry asserted that “the rights of everyone to freedom of thought and religion … is a constitutional right”, noting Indonesia’s observance of religious holidays as proof of its pluralistic and tolerant approach.

Indonesia’s foreign minister Retno Marsudi stated that two rounds of the election were conducted in a “free, transparent and peaceful manner” where both sides accepted the result and expressed their willingness to work together.

Quoting US Vice President Mike Pence’s recent comments during a diplomatic visit in Jakarta, an Indonesian delegate added that Indonesian Islam remained an “inspiration to the world.”

A raft of nations including Brazil, Norway and Switzerland urged Indonesia to implement greater protection for the rights of “sexual minorities” and the LGBTQI community.
Last year saw an upsurge in anti-homosexuality rhetoric, with the government actively banning LGBT-friendly social media applications.

More protection for some vulnerable groups
It was observed that since the last UPR session, Indonesia has ratified two optional protocols of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Migrant Workers convention, and many states lauded Indonesia’s gains regarding the right to education and the rights of women and children.
The delegation from the Maldives praised Indonesia’s progress in advancing education rights, noting a 95 percent literacy rate and a youth literacy rate of 99 percent.

Nevertheless, several delegations urged Indonesia to implement more principles from the UN Child Rights Convention into its domestic laws, in particular changing legislation that allows for marriage under the age of 18 and for minors to be imprisoned alongside adult offenders.

Pressed on child marriage, Indonesia claimed it had implemented initiatives to combat early marriage, including by improving family welfare programs and increasing awareness of the health risks of early pregnancy.

The representative pointed to religious edicts by a summit of female Islamic clerics last week, noting the country’s religious affairs minister had supported recommendations to raise the legal marriage age from 16 to 18 and “will follow them up accordingly.”

Challenged on the prevalence of female genital mutilation, an Indonesian delegate said that it was a “long held tradition and belief” but that the government was committed to raise awareness among medical and health workers on the issue.

Moreover, Marsudi said protection of migrant workers and their families was “one of the top priorities of Indonesian foreign policy.”

The government had bolstered migrant worker rights through improving domestic policy, law enforcement and enhancing protecting efforts by Indonesian missions abroad, she said.

A student shouts a slogan as he holds a placard during a protest at the PT Freeport Indonesia headquarters calling of the closure of its mine in the Papua province, in Jakarta, Indonesia, April 7, 2017. Source: Reuters/Beawiharta.

Papua and media freedom
New Zealand praised advances for indigenous people in Indonesia, including President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo’s return of 13,000 hectares to communities in  North Sumatra and a pledge to return 2.7 million hectares by 2019.

But along with many other states parties, New Zealand also raised concerns about alleged human rights abuses, suppression of activists and a lack of media transparency in the Papua and West Papua provinces of Indonesia – a highly sensitive issue for Jakarta.

Marsudi asserted that Papua was an “integral part of the Republic of Indonesia,” that the government “appreciate very much” the input of the international community “for the betterment of Papua.”
Nevertheless, the minister pointed to “open, transparent, free and fair elections” and funding from Jakarta to Papua exceeded that given to most other parts of Indonesia due to their special autonomy status, she said.

Addressing criticism that foreign journalists were continuing to be restricted in their access to Papua, Marsudi said the issue “now has been addressed by the government  … [which] has simplified the procedure of journalists applications.”

Journalists visiting Papua and West Papua had “significantly increased,” she said, with “more than 41 percent in 2015 compared to 2014.”

Incidentally, Indonesia’s capital Jakarta was chosen by Unesco to mark World Press Freedom Day 2017 on Wednesday. ***Black_Fox

This posting taken from the situs of https://asiancorrespondent.com/




Rabu, Mei 3

"Apa Jawaban Indonesia Pada UN Human Rights UPR Mey 2017 ?"

Suasana Aksi Demo Yang Dihalau Polisi (Foto Pribadi)
Pemerintah Indonesia dikabarkan akan memberikan Jawaban to the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) mechanism, berkaitan dengan kemajuan situasi Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia. Berdasarkan tentavies time table for the 27th session, Indonesia dijadwalkan mendapati giliran setelah Bahrain dan Tunisia. 

Ini adalah siklus UN UPR ketiga partisipasi Indonesia dibidang Human Rights, setelah tahun 2008 dan 2012 pernah diikuti Indonesia. ... silahkan ikuti rekomendasi UPR kepada Indonesia tahun 2012 lalu pada link blog dibawah ini . http://svaxnet.blogspot.co.id/2012/05/upr-geneva-empat-belas-negara-respon.html

Saat ini, Pemerintah Jakarta sedang sangat siap untuk mengikuti kegiatan ini,   menurut rencana via media on-line Menlu Retno Marsudi dan Menteri Hukum dan HAM Yasona Laoly akan terlibat secara langsung di Geneva pada 3 Mey 2017. Direktur HAM, Direktorat Jenderal Kerja Sama Multilateral Kemlu Dicky Komar menyebut, ada lima isu besar yang akan diantisipasi Indonesia yakni ; Isu Papua, Pelanggaran HAM Masa lalu, kelompok minortas, Hukuman Mati, dan Kelompok Perempuan. 

Pertanyaan berikutnya adalah, apa jawaban Indonesia ? untuk Papua, Jokowi ketika menduduki kursi Presiden memberi jawaban akan membebaskan seluruh Tahanan Politik di Papua dan Papua Barat, memberi kebebasan bagi akses jurnalis asing untuk masuk meliput Papua dan membuka ruang demokrasi (hak menyampaikan/menyatakan pendapat yang seluas-luasnya kepada rakyat sipil di Papua.

Namun, pada kenyataannya misalnya, Pasal makar (subversif) tidak pernah dihilangkan dari KUHP (Kitab Hukum Pidana) Indonesia, artinya kapanpun pasal ini bisa terus dipergunakan oleh penegak hukum Indonesia, berikutnya saat ini, ruang tahanan (Lembaga Pemasyarakatan) Di Papua dan Papua Barat masih menyimpan para tahanan-tahanan yang diputus bersalah oleh pengadilan akibat dakwaan makar. 

Jurnalis asing juga demikian, berbelitnya proses perijinan masih didapati, bahkan deportasi masih sering dilakukan kepada jurnalis asing yang dituduh berafiliasi dengan kelompok masyarakat pribumi yang dianggap berseberangan pandangan politik dengan Negara Indonesia. 

Hak menyatakan pendapat the freedom of expression and opinion also mendapati perlawanan dan penolakan dengan dasar surat ijin dari Kepolisian.

Kasus Wamena berdarah tahun 2000 dan Wasior berdarah tahun 2001 serta Paniai blooded on december 2014 belum mendapati kemajuan signifikan, walaupun kasus-kasus ini dipastikan saat ini ada diatas meja istana. 

Ini adalah UPR third session for the Indonesian Governance, seharusnya pemerintah lebih maju dari session UPR ke-dua (tahun 2012) dan session pertama (tahun 2008).  Indonesia harus memastikan tidak ada pertanyaan yang sama dan melangkah pada pertanyaan atau rekomendasi berikut dari Negara-Negara anggota. 

Jakarta, tidak seharusnya paranoid terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia di Papua Barat apabilah memang faktanya pemerintah belum menjawab rekomendasi - rekomendasi terhadap Papua. para pemimpin Negara Pasifik kerap mendesak pemerintah Indonesia untuk lebih serius berpikir langkah strategis menyelesaikan perkara hukum Papua dari perkara politik. ***Black_Fox

Resource personals article